How it works Static code analysis Technical paper

Choose a category:

Breaking Brooks’s Law

October 7th, 2008 by Rich Sharpe. Posted in Agile, Enerjy.tv, General, Innovation, Process Improvement, Software Quality

Fred Brooks’s law of ‘adding manpower to a late software project makes it later‘ is one most of us have tried to prove wrong…….and failed!I was at Agile 2008 and saw an interesting session, “Breaking Brooks’s Law” from Menlo Innovations, a Michigan based Java development company. They claimed to disprove this law and demonstrated their working environment and techniques that allowed them to do so.Although the presentation was only 45 minutes, we were in the room for almost 2 hours asking questions to determine how robust their techniques were, and to gain more insight into the conditions developers work under.Menlo’s results are based on a 3 year project that the customer had a deadline to demonstrate at a show. More features were required for the show than currently in the plan. So rather than re-prioritize, Menlo decided to add more developers to attempt to complete the work. They managed to complete the Project on time with all added functionality.The environment at Menlo is quite unique. All developers are co-located in the same large room (no offices or cubes) and pair program 100% of the time - they follow strict XP practices. A scheduling team determines which projects developers work on and who they pair with on a weekly basis. So developers work with different team members and possibly different projects every week.Also, as part of the contract, the customer comes to Menlo every week to prioritize the work for the next sprint.These techniques may appear somewhat draconian (100% paring for example). I managed to catch up with the team and interview them to discuss this project further, bug rates, staff attrition rates and how Project Managers can push the message of pairing to Senior Managements/Directors (see video).I thoroughly enjoyed talking with the team from Menlo and they invite anyone passing by to stop in and take a look at how they operate. They also have an interview process which involves a large number of candidates performing a number of tasks including Pair Programming, with an appointment you can observe this too. A detailed paper about their techniques and contact details are here.

4 responses to “Breaking Brooks’s Law”

  1. Bernd says:

    Gosh, I would be stressed to dead in that Environment. But I can understand why you want to burn your ressources out if you can get new ones quickly in line.

    Bernd

  2. Software Integrity » Blog Archive » Scrum Is Not The Silver Bullet says:

    […] One opposing theory is; teams will adopt whatever practices they can implement easily and quickly to comply with senior management edicts so they can claim their organizations are ‘Agile’ (whatever that means to them?!?). The reality is, underneath they will really be working in a Waterfall manner with little change to project success. Such proponents of this theory will state that only by following the practices strictly, can you achieve project success repeatedly (as demonstrated by Menlo Innovations). […]

  3. Noel Grandin says:

    That’s just silly. Brooks law didn’t apply to them because they were not yet late.
    Brooks law simply expresses the often hidden cost to an existing team of training up new team members.

    In this case, the company had sufficient time left in the schedule that the cost of training new people was exceeded by the incremental benefit of those people.

    Nothing magical at all.

  4. Kylie Batt says:

    Жаль, что сейчас не могу высказаться - очень занят. Но вернусь - обязательно напишу что я думаю по этому вопросу….

    оператор ПК Fred Brooks’s law of ‘adding manpower to a late software project makes it later‘ is one most of us have tried to prove wrong………..